Consistency of perturbed tribimaximal, bimaximal and democratic mixing with neutrino mixing data

Sumit K. Garg (Department of Physics, CMR University, Bengaluru 562149, India)

We scrutinize corrections to tribimaximal (TBM), bimaximal (BM) and democratic (DC) mixing matrices for explaining recent global fit neutrino mixing data. These corrections are parameterized in terms of small orthogonal rotations (R) with corresponding modified PMNS matrices of the forms (RijlU,URijr,URijrRklr,RijlRkllU) where Rijl,r is rotation in ij sector and U is any one of these special matrices. We showed that for perturbative schemes dictated by single rotation, only (R12lUBM,R13lUBM,UTBMR13r) can fit the mixing data at 3σ level. However for RijlRkllU type rotations, only (R23lR13lUDC) is successful to fit all neutrino mixing angles within 1σ range. For URijrRklr perturbative scheme, only (UBMR12rR13r,UDCR12rR23r,UTBMR12rR13r) are consistent at 1σ level. The remaining double rotation cases are either excluded at 3σ level or successful in producing mixing angles only at 2σ3σ level. We also updated our previous analysis on PMNS matrices of the form (RijURkl) with recent mixing data. We showed that the results modifies substantially with fitting accuracy level decreases for all of the permitted cases except (R12UBMR13,R23UTBMR13 and R13UTBMR13) in this rotation scheme.

{
  "_oai": {
    "updated": "2020-01-24T09:34:03Z", 
    "id": "oai:repo.scoap3.org:25442", 
    "sets": [
      "NPB"
    ]
  }, 
  "authors": [
    {
      "affiliations": [
        {
          "country": "India", 
          "value": "Department of Physics, CMR University, Bengaluru 562149, India"
        }
      ], 
      "surname": "Garg", 
      "email": "sumit.k@cmr.edu.in", 
      "full_name": "Garg, Sumit K.", 
      "given_names": "Sumit K."
    }
  ], 
  "titles": [
    {
      "source": "Elsevier", 
      "title": "Consistency of perturbed tribimaximal, bimaximal and democratic mixing with neutrino mixing data"
    }
  ], 
  "dois": [
    {
      "value": "10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2018.04.022"
    }
  ], 
  "publication_info": [
    {
      "page_end": "505", 
      "journal_title": "Nuclear Physics B", 
      "material": "article", 
      "journal_volume": "931 C", 
      "artid": "14339", 
      "year": 2018, 
      "page_start": "469"
    }
  ], 
  "$schema": "http://repo.scoap3.org/schemas/hep.json", 
  "acquisition_source": {
    "date": "2020-01-24T10:30:28.434951", 
    "source": "Elsevier", 
    "method": "Elsevier", 
    "submission_number": "17b151703e8c11eaad1402163e01809a"
  }, 
  "page_nr": [
    37
  ], 
  "license": [
    {
      "url": "http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/", 
      "license": "CC-BY-3.0"
    }
  ], 
  "copyright": [
    {
      "holder": "The Author(s)", 
      "statement": "The Author(s)", 
      "year": "2018"
    }
  ], 
  "control_number": "25442", 
  "record_creation_date": "2018-06-04T15:36:28.521950", 
  "_files": [
    {
      "checksum": "md5:e9a68d00072e8d0192550857267c2e78", 
      "filetype": "xml", 
      "bucket": "16621c50-e08d-4297-9faa-87c3e6da2068", 
      "version_id": "d99c04f6-7da6-486d-8e95-93e6ebe0fc39", 
      "key": "10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2018.04.022.xml", 
      "size": 432726
    }, 
    {
      "checksum": "md5:78e43add1cb769cb7df0f3b0b417da8b", 
      "filetype": "pdf", 
      "bucket": "16621c50-e08d-4297-9faa-87c3e6da2068", 
      "version_id": "c6ff1cce-6bd0-4f4d-94ef-8b3aec3e2929", 
      "key": "10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2018.04.022.pdf", 
      "size": 11332081
    }, 
    {
      "checksum": "md5:d76dcbaf0cf24147db312c4ecd2350d1", 
      "filetype": "pdf/a", 
      "bucket": "16621c50-e08d-4297-9faa-87c3e6da2068", 
      "version_id": "eee9c2b6-53d3-40f2-889f-bb47fe2de0e3", 
      "key": "10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2018.04.022_a.pdf", 
      "size": 11631643
    }
  ], 
  "collections": [
    {
      "primary": "Nuclear Physics B"
    }
  ], 
  "abstracts": [
    {
      "source": "Elsevier", 
      "value": "We scrutinize corrections to tribimaximal (TBM), bimaximal (BM) and democratic (DC) mixing matrices for explaining recent global fit neutrino mixing data. These corrections are parameterized in terms of small orthogonal rotations (R) with corresponding modified PMNS matrices of the forms <math><mo>(</mo><msubsup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>i</mi><mi>j</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>l</mi></mrow></msubsup><mo>\u22c5</mo><mi>U</mi><mo>,</mo><mspace width=\"0.25em\"></mspace><mi>U</mi><mo>\u22c5</mo><msubsup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>i</mi><mi>j</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>r</mi></mrow></msubsup><mo>,</mo><mspace width=\"0.25em\"></mspace><mi>U</mi><mo>\u22c5</mo><msubsup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>i</mi><mi>j</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>r</mi></mrow></msubsup><mo>\u22c5</mo><msubsup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>k</mi><mi>l</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>r</mi></mrow></msubsup><mo>,</mo><mspace width=\"0.25em\"></mspace><msubsup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>i</mi><mi>j</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>l</mi></mrow></msubsup><mo>\u22c5</mo><msubsup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>k</mi><mi>l</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>l</mi></mrow></msubsup><mo>\u22c5</mo><mi>U</mi><mo>)</mo></math> where <math><msubsup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>i</mi><mi>j</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>l</mi><mo>,</mo><mi>r</mi></mrow></msubsup></math> is rotation in ij sector and U is any one of these special matrices. We showed that for perturbative schemes dictated by single rotation, only <math><mo>(</mo><msubsup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>12</mn></mrow><mrow><mi>l</mi></mrow></msubsup><mo>\u22c5</mo><msub><mrow><mi>U</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>B</mi><mi>M</mi></mrow></msub><mo>,</mo><mspace width=\"0.25em\"></mspace><msubsup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>13</mn></mrow><mrow><mi>l</mi></mrow></msubsup><mo>\u22c5</mo><msub><mrow><mi>U</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>B</mi><mi>M</mi></mrow></msub><mo>,</mo><mspace width=\"0.25em\"></mspace><msub><mrow><mi>U</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>T</mi><mi>B</mi><mi>M</mi></mrow></msub><mo>\u22c5</mo><msubsup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>13</mn></mrow><mrow><mi>r</mi></mrow></msubsup><mo>)</mo></math> can fit the mixing data at 3\u03c3 level. However for <math><msubsup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>i</mi><mi>j</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>l</mi></mrow></msubsup><mo>\u22c5</mo><msubsup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>k</mi><mi>l</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>l</mi></mrow></msubsup><mo>\u22c5</mo><mi>U</mi></math> type rotations, only <math><mo>(</mo><msubsup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>23</mn></mrow><mrow><mi>l</mi></mrow></msubsup><mo>\u22c5</mo><msubsup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>13</mn></mrow><mrow><mi>l</mi></mrow></msubsup><mo>\u22c5</mo><msub><mrow><mi>U</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>D</mi><mi>C</mi></mrow></msub><mo>)</mo></math> is successful to fit all neutrino mixing angles within 1\u03c3 range. For <math><mi>U</mi><mo>\u22c5</mo><msubsup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>i</mi><mi>j</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>r</mi></mrow></msubsup><mo>\u22c5</mo><msubsup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>k</mi><mi>l</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>r</mi></mrow></msubsup></math> perturbative scheme, only <math><mo>(</mo><msub><mrow><mi>U</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>B</mi><mi>M</mi></mrow></msub><mo>\u22c5</mo><msubsup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>12</mn></mrow><mrow><mi>r</mi></mrow></msubsup><mo>\u22c5</mo><msubsup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>13</mn></mrow><mrow><mi>r</mi></mrow></msubsup><mo>,</mo><mspace width=\"0.25em\"></mspace><msub><mrow><mi>U</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>D</mi><mi>C</mi></mrow></msub><mo>\u22c5</mo><msubsup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>12</mn></mrow><mrow><mi>r</mi></mrow></msubsup><mo>\u22c5</mo><msubsup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>23</mn></mrow><mrow><mi>r</mi></mrow></msubsup><mo>,</mo><mspace width=\"0.25em\"></mspace><msub><mrow><mi>U</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>T</mi><mi>B</mi><mi>M</mi></mrow></msub><mo>\u22c5</mo><msubsup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>12</mn></mrow><mrow><mi>r</mi></mrow></msubsup><mo>\u22c5</mo><msubsup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>13</mn></mrow><mrow><mi>r</mi></mrow></msubsup><mo>)</mo></math> are consistent at 1\u03c3 level. The remaining double rotation cases are either excluded at 3\u03c3 level or successful in producing mixing angles only at <math><mn>2</mn><mi>\u03c3</mi><mo>\u2212</mo><mn>3</mn><mi>\u03c3</mi></math> level. We also updated our previous analysis on PMNS matrices of the form <math><mo>(</mo><msub><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>i</mi><mi>j</mi></mrow></msub><mo>\u22c5</mo><mi>U</mi><mo>\u22c5</mo><msub><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>k</mi><mi>l</mi></mrow></msub><mo>)</mo></math> with recent mixing data. We showed that the results modifies substantially with fitting accuracy level decreases for all of the permitted cases except <math><mo>(</mo><msub><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>12</mn></mrow></msub><mo>\u22c5</mo><msub><mrow><mi>U</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>B</mi><mi>M</mi></mrow></msub><mo>\u22c5</mo><msub><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>13</mn></mrow></msub><mo>,</mo><mspace width=\"0.25em\"></mspace><msub><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>23</mn></mrow></msub><mo>\u22c5</mo><msub><mrow><mi>U</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>T</mi><mi>B</mi><mi>M</mi></mrow></msub><mo>\u22c5</mo><msub><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>13</mn></mrow></msub><mtext> and </mtext><msub><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>13</mn></mrow></msub><mo>\u22c5</mo><msub><mrow><mi>U</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>T</mi><mi>B</mi><mi>M</mi></mrow></msub><mo>\u22c5</mo><msub><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>13</mn></mrow></msub><mo>)</mo></math> in this rotation scheme."
    }
  ], 
  "imprints": [
    {
      "date": "2018-05-25", 
      "publisher": "Elsevier"
    }
  ]
}
Published on:
25 May 2018
Publisher:
Elsevier
Published in:
Nuclear Physics B , Volume 931 C (2018)

Pages 469-505
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2018.04.022
Copyrights:
The Author(s)
Licence:
CC-BY-3.0

Fulltext files: