A variety of options for interpreting the DØ state, X(5568) , are examined. We find that threshold, cusp, molecular, and tetraquark models are all unfavoured. Several experimental tests for unravelling the nature of the signal are suggested.
{ "license": [ { "url": "http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/", "license": "CC-BY-3.0" } ], "copyright": [ { "statement": "The Author(s)" } ], "control_number": "16509", "_oai": { "updated": "2018-04-18T13:02:01Z", "id": "oai:repo.scoap3.org:16509", "sets": [ "PLB" ] }, "authors": [ { "surname": "Burns", "given_names": "T.J.", "raw_name": "Burns, T.J.", "affiliations": [ { "country": "UK", "value": "Department of Physics, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK" } ], "full_name": "Burns, T.J.", "orcid": "0000-0002-7201-6437" }, { "raw_name": "Swanson, E.S.", "affiliations": [ { "country": "USA", "value": "Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, USA" } ], "surname": "Swanson", "given_names": "E.S.", "full_name": "Swanson, E.S." } ], "_files": [ { "checksum": "md5:f25fbda8e4cb44c01327aea21eb5b58a", "filetype": "xml", "bucket": "b736cb2c-59d6-4086-a43f-80b1eaefbe46", "version_id": "d6c901c9-8524-4ec2-845c-5a048f36896c", "key": "10.1016/j.physletb.2016.07.049.xml", "size": 189858 }, { "checksum": "md5:9f162b330353100463c845db362c8c17", "filetype": "pdf", "bucket": "b736cb2c-59d6-4086-a43f-80b1eaefbe46", "version_id": "eda36d16-b153-4240-9dd4-17bafdce81c3", "key": "10.1016/j.physletb.2016.07.049.pdf", "size": 427702 }, { "checksum": "md5:9aad19efd03a046f9f00df474f7312bd", "filetype": "pdf/a", "bucket": "b736cb2c-59d6-4086-a43f-80b1eaefbe46", "version_id": "794056f1-cca4-444f-97d7-4d1fb32d5ac5", "key": "10.1016/j.physletb.2016.07.049_a.pdf", "size": 763381 } ], "record_creation_date": "2016-07-21T00:00:00", "titles": [ { "source": "Elsevier", "title": "Interpreting the X (5568)" } ], "dois": [ { "value": "10.1016/j.physletb.2016.07.049" } ], "publication_info": [ { "journal_title": "Physics Letters B", "material": "article", "year": 2016 } ], "$schema": "http://repo.scoap3.org/schemas/hep.json", "abstracts": [ { "source": "Elsevier", "value": "A variety of options for interpreting the D\u00d8 state, X(5568) , are examined. We find that threshold, cusp, molecular, and tetraquark models are all unfavoured. Several experimental tests for unravelling the nature of the signal are suggested." } ], "imprints": [ { "date": "2016-07-22", "publisher": "Elsevier" } ], "acquisition_source": { "date": "2016-07-21T00:00:00", "source": "Elsevier", "method": "scoap3", "submission_number": "372790d4430511e898b102163e01809a" } }