We propose a new inverse seesaw model based on hidden local <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mi>U</mi><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><mn>1</mn><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></math> symmetry framework where the inverse seesaw mechanism is induced at one loop level. A Majorana mass term of singlet fermion is forbidden by the <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mi>U</mi><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><mn>1</mn><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></math> symmetry and it is generated at one-loop level by introducing relevant particle contents to get loop diagram, inducing inverse seesaw mechanism. The same particle contents also contribute to lepton magnetic(electric) dipole moment and lepton flavor violating decays without chiral suppression. We can then obtain sizable muon anomalous magnetic dipole moment that accommodate with deviation from the standard model prediction. The constraints from lepton flavor violating decays and electron magnetic(electric) dipole moment are also discussed to explore testability of the model.

China

Takaaki Nomura

Japan

Hiroshi Okada

Radiative inverse seesaw model with hidden <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mi>U</mi><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><mn>1</mn><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></math> gauge symmetry enhancing lepton <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mi>g</mi><mo>−</mo><mn>2</mn></math>

In the heavy quarkonium decay process <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mi>V</mi><mo stretchy="false">→</mo><mi>g</mi><mi>g</mi><mi>g</mi></math> (<math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mi>V</mi><mo>=</mo><mi>J</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>ψ</mi><mo>,</mo><mi mathvariant="normal">ϒ</mi></math>), making a definite prediction including relativistic corrections has so far remained a significant challenge. In this work, we study this decay process by taking into account the relativistic corrections in the Bethe-Salpeter formalism, where the relativistic bound-state wave function of quarkonium is obtained by solving the Bethe-Salpeter equation under the covariant instantaneous ansatz. Through analytical calculation, we find that some polarized decay widths vanish due to the helicity selection rule, which suppresses the corresponding helicity amplitudes. Owing to helicity flip symmetry and phase space symmetry, the nonvanishing polarized decay widths are not all independent; they are related through a set of symmetry relations. Then we obtain the unpolarized decay width formula <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mi><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><mi>V</mi><mo stretchy="false">→</mo><mi>g</mi><mi>g</mi><mi>g</mi><mo stretchy="false">)</mo><mo>=</mo><mfrac><mrow><mn>80</mn><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><msup><mi>π</mi><mn>2</mn></msup><mo stretchy="false">−</mo><mn>9</mn><mo stretchy="false">)</mo><msubsup><mi>α</mi><mi>s</mi><mn>3</mn></msubsup><msubsup><mi>N</mi><mi>V</mi><mn>2</mn></msubsup><msubsup><mi>β</mi><mi>V</mi><mn>3</mn></msubsup></mrow><mrow><mn>81</mn><msup><mi>π</mi><mrow><mn>9</mn><mo stretchy="false">/</mo><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup><mi>M</mi></mrow></mfrac><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><mn>1</mn><mo>−</mo><mi>κ</mi><mfrac><msubsup><mi>β</mi><mi>V</mi><mn>2</mn></msubsup><msup><mi>M</mi><mn>2</mn></msup></mfrac><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></math>, where the factor <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mi>κ</mi><mfrac><msubsup><mi>β</mi><mi>V</mi><mn>2</mn></msubsup><msup><mi>M</mi><mn>2</mn></msup></mfrac></math> arises from the relativistic corrections with <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mi>κ</mi><mo>≡</mo><mfrac><mrow><mn>3</mn><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><mn>112</mn><mo stretchy="false">+</mo><mn>25</mn><msup><mi>π</mi><mn>2</mn></msup><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></mrow><mrow><mn>16</mn><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><msup><mi>π</mi><mn>2</mn></msup><mo stretchy="false">−</mo><mn>9</mn><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></mrow></mfrac></math>. Furthermore, including both relativistic and QCD radiative corrections within the factorization assumption, our predictions of <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mi mathvariant="script">B</mi><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><mi>V</mi><mo stretchy="false">→</mo><mi>g</mi><mi>g</mi><mi>g</mi><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></math> and <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mi mathvariant="script">B</mi><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><mi>V</mi><mo stretchy="false">→</mo><msup><mi>e</mi><mo>+</mo></msup><msup><mi>e</mi><mo>−</mo></msup><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></math> agree well with their experimental data. As a crossing check, with the experimental value of the ratio <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><msub><mi>R</mi><mi>V</mi></msub><mo>=</mo><mfrac><mrow><mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mi><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><mi>V</mi><mo stretchy="false">→</mo><mi>g</mi><mi>g</mi><mi>g</mi><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></mrow><mrow><mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mi><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><mi>V</mi><mo stretchy="false">→</mo><msup><mi>e</mi><mo stretchy="false">+</mo></msup><msup><mi>e</mi><mo stretchy="false">−</mo></msup><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></mrow></mfrac></math> and our result for <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><msub><mi>R</mi><mi>V</mi></msub></math>, we extract <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><msub><mi>α</mi><mi>s</mi></msub><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><msub><mi>M</mi><mrow><mi>J</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>ψ</mi></mrow></msub><mo>/</mo><mn>2</mn><mo stretchy="false">)</mo><mo>=</mo><mn>0.31</mn></math> and <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><msub><mi>α</mi><mi>s</mi></msub><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><msub><mi>M</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">ϒ</mi></msub><mo>/</mo><mn>2</mn><mo stretchy="false">)</mo><mo>=</mo><mn>0.20</mn></math>, respectively.

Hong-Mei Jiang

Chao-Jie Fan

Jun-Kang He

Cui Kong

Heavy quarkonium decay <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mi>V</mi><mo stretchy="false">→</mo><mi>g</mi><mi>g</mi><mi>g</mi></math> with both relativistic and QCD radiative corrections

The particle origin of dark matter (DM) remains elusive despite decades of direct, indirect, and collider searches. Several groups have reported a <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mi>γ</mi></math>-ray excess toward the Galactic Center commonly referred to as the Galactic Center excess (GCE). Its spectrum is consistent with annihilation of weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs) of mass <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mrow><mi mathvariant="script">O</mi><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><mn>10</mn><mo>−</mo><mn>100</mn><mo stretchy="false">)</mo><mtext> </mtext><mtext> </mtext><mi>GeV</mi></mrow></math> and a thermal-relic cross section. Although many concrete WIMP models reproduce the GCE spectrum, most are now excluded by direct detection experiments that are approaching the neutrino floor. We investigate a class of anomaly-free extensions of the Standard Model featuring gauged differences of lepton number, <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mi>U</mi><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><mn>1</mn><msub><mo stretchy="false">)</mo><mrow><msub><mi>L</mi><mi>i</mi></msub><mo>−</mo><msub><mi>L</mi><mi>j</mi></msub></mrow></msub></math>, and gauged baryon minus lepton number, <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mi>U</mi><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><mn>1</mn><msub><mo stretchy="false">)</mo><mrow><mi>B</mi><mo>−</mo><mi>L</mi></mrow></msub></math>. We show that these models can reproduce the GCE while remaining compatible with the observed relic abundance. We then impose collider and direct detection constraints, accounting for both tree-level and loop-induced kinetic mixing. The <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><msub><mi>L</mi><mi>μ</mi></msub><mo>−</mo><msub><mi>L</mi><mi>e</mi></msub></math> model gives the best fit to the GCE: a DM mass of <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>m</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>χ</mi></mrow></msub><mo>∼</mo><mn>40</mn><mo>−</mo><mn>50</mn><mtext> </mtext><mtext> </mtext><mi>GeV</mi></mrow></math> remains consistent with the muon and electron magnetic moment anomalies, <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><mi>g</mi><mo>−</mo><mn>2</mn><msub><mo stretchy="false">)</mo><mrow><mi>μ</mi><mo>,</mo><mi>e</mi></mrow></msub></math>, as well as current collider and direct detection limits, for mediator masses in the range <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>m</mi></mrow><mrow><msup><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>′</mo></mrow></msup></mrow></msub><mo>∼</mo><mn>70</mn><mo>−</mo><mn>86</mn><mtext> </mtext><mtext> </mtext><mi>GeV</mi></mrow></math> and a DM mediator coupling of <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mrow><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><mn>1</mn><mo>−</mo><mn>5</mn><mo stretchy="false">)</mo><mo>×</mo><msup><mrow><mn>10</mn></mrow><mrow><mo>−</mo><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></math>. By contrast, the <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><msub><mi>L</mi><mi>e</mi></msub><mo>−</mo><msub><mi>L</mi><mi>τ</mi></msub></math> and <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><msub><mi>L</mi><mi>μ</mi></msub><mo>−</mo><msub><mi>L</mi><mi>τ</mi></msub></math> models yield poorer fits; satisfying both the relic density and experimental bounds forces the DM mass to lie very close to resonance (i.e. approximately half the mediator mass). Finally, while the <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mi>B</mi><mo>−</mo><mi>L</mi></math> model also matches the GCE well, its parameter space is almost entirely ruled out by strong direct detection limits, except for the narrow resonance region where <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><msub><mi>m</mi><mi>χ</mi></msub></math> should be equal to <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><msub><mi>m</mi><msup><mi>A</mi><mo>′</mo></msup></msub><mo>/</mo><mn>2</mn></math> requiring a fine-tuning at the few-percent level.

Italy

Jordan Koechler

Mattia Di Mauro

Leptophilic dark matter in <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mi>U</mi><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><mn>1</mn><msub><mo stretchy="false">)</mo><mrow><msub><mi>L</mi><mi>i</mi></msub><mo>−</mo><msub><mi>L</mi><mi>j</mi></msub></mrow></msub></math> models: A solution to the Fermi-LAT Galactic Center excess consistent with cosmological and laboratory observations

We present a search for solar axions produced through the axion-electron coupling ($\textit{g}$ ) using data from a novel 7-GridPix detector installed at the CERN Axion Solar Telescope (CAST). The detector, featuring ultra-thin silicon nitride windows and multiple veto systems, collected approximately 160 hours of solar tracking data between 2017–2018. Using machine learning techniques and the veto systems, we achieved a background rate of 1.06 × 10 keV cm s at a signal efficiency of about 80% in the 0.2 to 8 keV range. Analysis of the data yielded no significant excess above background, allowing us to set a new upper limit on the product of the axion-electron and axion-photon couplings of $\textit{g}$ · $\textit{g}$ < 7.35 × 10 GeV at 95% confidence level for axion masses below 10 meV. This result improves upon the previous best helioscope limit and demonstrates the potential of GridPix technology for rare event searches. Additionally, we derived a limit on the axion-photon coupling of $\textit{g}$ < 9.0 × 10 GeV at 95% CL, which, while not surpassing CAST’s best limit, provides complementary constraints on axion models.

Spain

K. Altenmüller

Greece

V. Anastassopoulos

Switzerland

S. Arguedas-Cuendis

France

S. Aune

Germany

J. Baier

K. Barth

H. Bräuninger

G. Cantatore

F. Caspers

J. Castel

Türkiye

S. Çetin

Denmark

F. Christensen

C. Cogollos

T. Dafni

M. Davenport

United States

T. Decker

K. Desch

D. Díez-Ibáñez

B. Döbrich

E. Ferrer-Ribas

H. Fischer

W. Funk

J. Galán

J. García

A. Gardikiotis

I. Giomataris

J. Golm

C. Hailey

Canada

M. Hasinoff

D. Hoffmann

I. Irastorza

J. Jacoby

A. Jakobsen

Croatia

K. Jakovčić

J. Kaminski

M. Karuza

S. Kostoglou

C. Krieger

B. Lakić

J. Laurent

G. Luzón

C. Malbrunot

C. Margalejo

M. Maroudas

South Korea

L. Miceli

H. Mirallas

P. Navarro

L. Obis

A. Özbey

K. Özbozduman

T. Papaevangelou

O. Pérez

M. Pivovaroff

Romania

M. Rosu

E. Ruiz-Chóliz

J. Ruz

T. Schiffer

S. Schmidt

M. Schumann

Y. Semertzidis

S. Solanki

L. Stewart

T. Vafeiadis

J. Vogel

K. Zioutas

Search for solar axions produced through the axion-electron coupling $\textit{g}$

We revisit the calculation of exclusive <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mi>J</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>ψ</mi></math> production in electron-proton scattering within the QCD dipole model, employing a refined description of the proton in terms of gluonic hot spots in the dilute regime. In contrast to earlier studies, we incorporate key missing elements; the event-by-event fluctuations in both the number of hot spots and their local saturation scales, as well as the first relativistic corrections to the <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mi>J</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>ψ</mi></math> wave function. We perform a Bayesian analysis to constrain the model parameters using HERA data. These enhancements significantly improve the agreement with HERA data. Saturation scale fluctuations are found to be more important than fluctuations in the number of hot spots. Including the first relativistic correction is found to be important, especially in order to describe the observed power-law behavior in the incoherent cross section at large <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mi>t</mi></math>.

Finland

Anh Dung Le

Heikki Mäntysaari

Exclusive <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mi>J</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>ψ</mi></math> production off a dilute proton within a refined hotspot description

Based on available experimental results on $ \chi _{cJ}(J=0,1,2) $ decays, we investigated the $ \chi_{cJ}\to PP $ , $ VV $ , $ PV $ , and $ PT $ decays using the $\textit{SU}$(3) flavor symmetry/breaking approach, where $\textit{P}$, $\textit{V}$, and $\textit{T}$ denote light pseudoscalar, vector, and tensor mesons, respectively. With the decay amplitude relations determined by $\textit{SU}$(3) flavor symmetry/breaking, we present the branching ratios for all $ \chi_{cJ}\to PP $ and $ \chi_{cJ}\to VV $ modes, including those without experimental data. While theoretical considerations strongly suppress or even forbid most $ \chi_{cJ}\to PV $ and $ PT $ decays, we also provide quantitative predictions constrained by existing experimental data. Our results are expected to be accessible in future experiments at BESIII and the planned Super Tau-Charm Facility.

Bo Lan

Qin-Ze Song

Jin-Huan Sheng

Yi Qiao

Ru-Min Wang

Study of χ$_{cJ}$ ($\textit{J}$ = 0,1,2) decays to light meson pairs based on $\textit{SU}$(3) flavor symmetry/breaking analysis * Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (12175088, 12305100, 12365014) and Graduate Innovation Fund Project of Jiangxi Provincial Department of Education (YJS2024091)

The production ratio of $\textit{ψ}$(2$\textit{S}$) to $\textit{J/ψ}$ charmonium states is presented as a function of multiplicity in proton-lead collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of $$ \sqrt{s_{\textrm{NN}}}=8.16 $$ TeV, for both prompt and nonprompt sources. The total luminosity recorded by the LHCb experiment corresponds to 13.6 nb for $\textit{p}$Pb collisions and 20.8 nb for Pb$\textit{p}$ collisions, where the first particle corresponds to the particle traveling towards the detector. Measurements are performed in the dimuon final state at forward (backward) centre-of-mass rapidity, with respect to the proton direction, 1$\textit{.}$5 $\textit{< y}$ $\textit{<}$ 4$\textit{.}$0 (−5$\textit{.}$0 $\textit{< y}$ $\textit{<}$ −2$\textit{.}$5) for $\textit{p}$Pb (Pb$\textit{p}$) collisions. A multiplicity dependence of the prompt production ratio is observed in $\textit{p}$Pb collisions, whereas no dependence is found in nonprompt production, nor in either prompt or nonprompt production in Pb$\textit{p}$ collisions. These results suggest that in the Pb-going direction additional suppression mechanisms beyond comover effects may be present, possibly related to the formation of quark-gluon plasma. This highlights a transition from small to large collision systems and provides important insight into the suppression of charmonia in proton-nucleus collisions.

Netherlands

R. Aaij

United Kingdom

A. Abdelmotteleb

C. Abellan Beteta

F. Abudinén

T. Ackernley

A. Adefisoye

B. Adeva

M. Adinolfi

Sweden

P. Adlarson

C. Agapopoulou

C. Aidala

Z. Ajaltouni

S. Akar

K. Akiba

P. Albicocco

J. Albrecht

F. Alessio

Z. Aliouche

P. Alvarez Cartelle

R. Amalric

Brazil

S. Amato

J. Amey

Y. Amhis

L. An

L. Anderlini

M. Andersson

P. Andreola

M. Andreotti

A. Anelli

D. Ao

F. Archilli

Z Areg

M. Argenton

Costa Rica

S. Arguedas Cuendis

A. Artamonov

M. Artuso

E. Aslanides

R. Ataíde Da Silva

M. Atzeni

B. Audurier

J. Authier

D. Bacher

I. Bachiller Perea

S. Bachmann

M. Bachmayer

J. Back

P. Baladron Rodriguez

V. Balagura

A. Balboni

W. Baldini

L. Balzani

H. Bao

J. Baptista de Souza Leite

C. Barbero Pretel

M. Barbetti

I. Barbosa

R. Barlow

M. Barnyakov

S. Barsuk

W. Barter

J. Bartz

Poland

S. Bashir

B. Batsukh

P. Battista

A. Bay

A. Beck

M. Becker

F. Bedeschi

I. Bediaga

N. Behling

S. Belin

K. Belous

I. Belov

I. Belyaev

G. Benane

G. Bencivenni

E. Ben-Haim

A. Berezhnoy

R. Bernet

S. Bernet Andres

A. Bertolin

C. Betancourt

F. Betti

J. Bex

Ia. Bezshyiko

Ukraine

O. Bezshyyko

Measurement of $\textit{ψ}$(2$\textit{S}$) to $\textit{J/ψ}$ cross-section ratio as function of multiplicity in $\textit{p}$Pb collisions at $$ \sqrt{s_{\textrm{NN}}}=8.16 $$ TeV