We present an analytic reconstruction of one-loop amplitudes for the process $$ 0\to \overline{q} qt\overline{t}H $$ . Our calculation is a novel use of analytic reconstruction, retaining explicit covariance in the massive spin states through the massive spinor-helicity formalism. The analytic reconstruction relies on embedding the massive five-point kinematics in a fully massless eight-point phase space while still building a minimal ansatz directly in the five-point phase space. In order to obtain compact analytic expressions it is necessary to identify suitable partial fraction decompositions and extract common numerator factors, which we achieve through careful inspection of limits in which pairs of denominators vanish. We find that the resulting amplitudes are more numerically efficient than ones computed using automatic methods but that the gains are not as significant as in the massless case, at least at present. The method opens the door to applications at two-loop order, where numerical efficiency and improvements in the reconstruction methodology are more crucial, especially with regards to the number of free parameters in the ansatz.

United States

John Campbell

United Kingdom

Giuseppe Laurentis

R. Ellis

Analytic reconstruction with massive particles: one-loop amplitudes for $$ 0\to \overline{q} qt\overline{t}H $$

A study of the charmless baryonic decays $$ {B}_{(s)}^0\to {K}^0p\overline{p} $$ is presented, where $$ {B}_{(s)}^0 $$ denotes either a $\textit{B}$ or a $$ {B}_s^0 $$ meson. The analysis is based on proton-proton collision data collected by the LHCb experiment at centre-of-mass energies of 7, 8, and 13 TeV, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 9 fb . The decay $$ {B}_s^0\to {K}^0p\overline{p} $$ is observed for the first time, with a measured branching fraction of (9$\textit{.}$14 $\textit{±}$ 1$\textit{.}$69 $\textit{±}$ 0$\textit{.}$90 $\textit{±}$ 0$\textit{.}$33 $\textit{±}$ 0$\textit{.}$20) $\textit{×}$ 10 and a significance of 5.6$\textit{σ}$. The uncertainties respectively account for statistical and systematic contributions, the precision of the branching fraction of the normalisation channel $\textit{B}$ $\textit{→ K}$ $\textit{π}$ $\textit{π}$ and the fragmentation fraction ratio $\textit{f}$ $\textit{/f}$ . The branching fraction determined for $$ {B}^0\to {K}^0p\overline{p} $$ is (2$\textit{.}$82 $\textit{±}$ 0$\textit{.}$08 $\textit{±}$ 0$\textit{.}$12 $\textit{±}$ 0$\textit{.}$10) $\textit{×}$ 10 , which is the most precise measurement to date.

Netherlands

R. Aaij

A. Abdelmotteleb

Switzerland

C. Abellan Beteta

F. Abudinén

T. Ackernley

A. Adefisoye

Spain

B. Adeva

M. Adinolfi

Sweden

P. Adlarson

France

C. Agapopoulou

C. Aidala

Z. Ajaltouni

S. Akar

K. Akiba

Italy

P. Albicocco

Germany

J. Albrecht

F. Alessio

Z. Aliouche

P. Alvarez Cartelle

R. Amalric

Brazil

S. Amato

J. Amey

Y. Amhis

China

L. An

L. Anderlini

M. Andersson

A. Andreianov

P. Andreola

M. Andreotti

D. Andreou

A. Anelli

D. Ao

F. Archilli

M. Argenton

Costa Rica

S. Arguedas Cuendis

A. Artamonov

M. Artuso

E. Aslanides

R. Ataíde Da Silva

M. Atzeni

B. Audurier

D. Bacher

I. Bachiller Perea

S. Bachmann

M. Bachmayer

J. Back

P. Baladron Rodriguez

V. Balagura

A. Balboni

W. Baldini

L. Balzani

H. Bao

J. Baptista de Souza Leite

C. Barbero Pretel

M. Barbetti

I. Barbosa

R. Barlow

M. Barnyakov

S. Barsuk

W. Barter

J. Bartz

Poland

S. Bashir

B. Batsukh

P. Battista

A. Bay

A. Beck

M. Becker

F. Bedeschi

I. Bediaga

N. Behling

S. Belin

K. Belous

I. Belov

I. Belyaev

G. Benane

G. Bencivenni

E. Ben-Haim

A. Berezhnoy

R. Bernet

S. Bernet Andres

A. Bertolin

C. Betancourt

F. Betti

J. Bex

Ia. Bezshyiko

Ukraine

O. Bezshyyko

J. Bhom

M. Bieker

N. Biesuz

P. Billoir

A. Biolchini

M. Birch

F. Bishop

A. Bitadze

A. Bizzeti

T. Blake

F. Blanc

J. Blank

S. Blusk

V. Bocharnikov

Observation of the decay $$ {B}_s^0\to {K}^0p\overline{p} $$ and measurement of the $$ {B}_{(s)}^0\to {K}^0p\overline{p} $$ branching fractions

<p>Addressing the fermion flavor structures using modular invariance is a challenging task in the framework of quark-lepton unification. Building on recent applications of modular symmetry in nonsupersymmetric models, we propose the first renormalizable <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mi>S</mi><mi>U</mi><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><mn>5</mn><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></math> grand unified theory incorporating level 3 nonholomorphic modular symmetry, <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mi><mn>3</mn></msub><mo>≃</mo><msub><mi>A</mi><mn>4</mn></msub></math>. This framework constrains Yukawa couplings to polyharmonic Maaß forms, significantly reducing the number of free parameters while enhancing the predictive power of the models. We present a comprehensive analysis of fermion masses and mixing while tackling key grand unified theory (GUT) queries such as gauge coupling unification and proton decay. Beyond the minimal <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mi>S</mi><mi>U</mi><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><mn>5</mn><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></math> framework, the Higgs sector incorporates the <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mn>4</mn><msub><mn>5</mn><mi>H</mi></msub></math> dimensional Higgs field crucial in differentiating the masses of down quarks and charged leptons, and the fermion sector is extended with three right-handed neutrinos enabling neutrino masses via the type-I seesaw mechanism. We analyze two benchmark models with distinct modular weight and <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><msub><mi>A</mi><mn>4</mn></msub></math> charge assignments. The predicted effective Majorana mass <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><msub><mi>m</mi><mrow><mi>β</mi><mi>β</mi></mrow></msub></math> values align with current neutrinoless double-beta decay experiments, and the effective neutrino mass <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><msub><mi>m</mi><mi>β</mi></msub></math> is within the reach of future beta decay searches. The predicted sum of neutrino masses, <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mo>∑</mo><msub><mi>m</mi><mi>i</mi></msub></math>, satisfies the upper bound set by recent cosmological observations. The gauge coupling unification is achieved through a light scalar triplet <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><msub><mi>ϕ</mi><mn>3</mn></msub><mo>∼</mo><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><mn>3</mn><mo>,</mo><mn>3</mn><mo>,</mo><mo>−</mo><mn>1</mn><mo>/</mo><mn>3</mn><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></math> and a scalar octet <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><msub><mi>ϕ</mi><mn>5</mn></msub><mo>∼</mo><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><mn>8</mn><mo>,</mo><mn>2</mn><mo>,</mo><mn>1</mn><mo>/</mo><mn>2</mn><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></math> belonging to the <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mn>4</mn><msub><mn>5</mn><mi>H</mi></msub></math> Higgs, while proton decay constraints require that the contribution of the <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mn>4</mn><msub><mn>5</mn><mi>H</mi></msub></math> Higgs to the up-quark mass matrix remains highly suppressed.</p>

United Arab Emirates

Mohamed Amin Loualidi

Morocco

Mohamed Miskaoui

Salah Nasri

Nonholomorphic <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><msub><mi>A</mi><mn>4</mn></msub></math> modular invariance for fermion masses and mixing in <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mi>S</mi><mi>U</mi><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><mn>5</mn><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></math> GUT

We study the decay of a heavy CP-even neutral Higgs into an on-shell Standard Model-like Higgs boson and two photons, $\textit{H}$ → $\textit{hγγ}$, in the two-Higgs doublet model. We argue that the decay channel $\textit{H}$ → $\textit{hγγ}$, followed by the decay of the Standard Model Higgs $$ h\to b\overline{b} $$ , could be observed at the 5$\textit{σ}$ level at the High-Luminosity LHC for masses of the heavy Higgs up to 950 GeV for the type-II, 650 GeV for the Lepton Specific and the Flipped 2HDMs, and 350 GeV for the type-I. We also discuss the possible role of the decay $\textit{H}$ → $\textit{hγγ}$ in discriminating among different types of 2HDMs and in enhancing the total number of events in the final state $$ H\to b\overline{b}\gamma \gamma $$ compared to the cascade decay $\textit{H}$ → $\textit{hh}$ followed by $\textit{h}$ → $\textit{γγ h}$ → $$ b\overline{b} $$ with identical final state (although with different kinematical distributions).

Mexico

M. Arroyo-Ureña

Alejandro Ibarra

Pablo Roig

T. Valencia-Pérez

Prospects for detecting the rare heavy Higgs decay $\textit{H}$ → $\textit{hγγ}$ through the $$ H\to b\overline{b}\gamma \gamma $$ channel at the LHC

<p>By analyzing <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mrow><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><mn>2712.4</mn><mo>±</mo><mn>14.3</mn><mo stretchy="false">)</mo><mo>×</mo><msup><mrow><mn>10</mn></mrow><mrow><mn>6</mn></mrow></msup><mtext> </mtext><mtext> </mtext><mi>ψ</mi><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><mn>3686</mn><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></mrow></math> events collected with the BESIII detector operating at the BEPCII collider, the decays <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>χ</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>c</mi><mn>0</mn><mo>,</mo><mn>1</mn><mo>,</mo><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub><mo stretchy="false">→</mo><mn>3</mn><msubsup><mrow><mi>K</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>S</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow></msubsup><msup><mrow><mi>K</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>±</mo></mrow></msup><msup><mrow><mi>π</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>∓</mo></mrow></msup></mrow></math> are observed for the first time with statistical significances greater than <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mn>10</mn><mi>σ</mi></math>. The branching fractions of these decays are determined to be <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mrow><mi mathvariant="script">B</mi><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><msub><mrow><mi>χ</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>c</mi><mn>0</mn></mrow></msub><mo stretchy="false">→</mo><mn>3</mn><msubsup><mrow><mi>K</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>S</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow></msubsup><msup><mrow><mi>K</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>±</mo></mrow></msup><msup><mrow><mi>π</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>∓</mo></mrow></msup><mo stretchy="false">)</mo><mo>=</mo><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><mn>7.95</mn><mo>±</mo><mn>0.50</mn><mo>±</mo><mn>0.65</mn><mo stretchy="false">)</mo><mo>×</mo><msup><mrow><mn>10</mn></mrow><mrow><mo>−</mo><mn>5</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></math>, <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mrow><mi mathvariant="script">B</mi><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><msub><mrow><mi>χ</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>c</mi><mn>1</mn></mrow></msub><mo stretchy="false">→</mo><mn>3</mn><msubsup><mrow><mi>K</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>S</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow></msubsup><msup><mrow><mi>K</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>±</mo></mrow></msup><msup><mrow><mi>π</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>∓</mo></mrow></msup><mo stretchy="false">)</mo><mo>=</mo><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><mn>2.62</mn><mo>±</mo><mn>0.08</mn><mo>±</mo><mn>0.19</mn><mo stretchy="false">)</mo><mo>×</mo><msup><mrow><mn>10</mn></mrow><mrow><mo>−</mo><mn>4</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></math>, and <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mrow><mi mathvariant="script">B</mi><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><msub><mrow><mi>χ</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>c</mi><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub><mo stretchy="false">→</mo><mn>3</mn><msubsup><mrow><mi>K</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>S</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow></msubsup><msup><mrow><mi>K</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>±</mo></mrow></msup><msup><mrow><mi>π</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>∓</mo></mrow></msup><mo stretchy="false">)</mo><mo>=</mo><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><mn>1.72</mn><mo>±</mo><mn>0.07</mn><mo>±</mo><mn>0.15</mn><mo stretchy="false">)</mo><mo>×</mo><msup><mrow><mn>10</mn></mrow><mrow><mo>−</mo><mn>4</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></math>, where the first uncertainties are statistical and the second systematic.</p>

M. Ablikim

Russia

M.N. Achasov

X.C. Ai

R. Aliberti

A. Amoroso

Q. An

Y. Bai

JINR

O. Bakina

Y. Ban

H.R. Bao

V. Batozskaya

Mongolia

K. Begzsuren

N. Berger

M. Berlowski

M. Bertani

D. Bettoni

F. Bianchi

E. Bianco

A. Bortone

I. Boyko

R.A. Briere

A. Brueggemann

H. Cai

M.H. Cai

X. Cai

A. Calcaterra

G.F. Cao

N. Cao

Türkiye

S.A. Cetin

X.Y. Chai

J.F. Chang

G.R. Che

Y.Z. Che

G. Chelkov

C. Chen

C.H. Chen

Chao Chen

G. Chen

H.S. Chen

H.Y. Chen

M.L. Chen

S.J. Chen

S.L. Chen

S.M. Chen

T. Chen

X.R. Chen

X.T. Chen

Y.B. Chen

Y.Q. Chen

Z.J. Chen

Z.K. Chen

South Korea

S.K. Choi

X. Chu

G. Cibinetto

F. Cossio

J.J. Cui

H.L. Dai

J.P. Dai

A. Dbeyssi

R.E. de Boer

Observation of <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><msub><mi>χ</mi><mrow><mi>c</mi><mi>J</mi></mrow></msub><mo stretchy="false">→</mo><mn>3</mn><msubsup><mi>K</mi><mi>S</mi><mn>0</mn></msubsup><msup><mi>K</mi><mo>±</mo></msup><msup><mi>π</mi><mo>∓</mo></msup></math>