We discuss the landscape of flavor physics at the Circular Electron-Positron Collider (CEPC), based on the nominal luminosity outlined in its Technical Design Report. The CEPC is designed to operate in multiple modes to address a variety of tasks. At the $\textit{Z}$ pole, the expected production of 4 Tera $\textit{Z}$ bosons will provide unique and highly precise measurements of $\textit{Z}$ boson couplings, while the substantial number of boosted heavy-flavored quarks and leptons produced in clean $\textit{Z}$ decays will facilitate investigations into their flavor physics with unprecedented precision. We investigate the prospects of measuring various physics benchmarks and discuss their implications for particle theories and phenomenological models. Our studies indicate that, with its highlighted advantages and anticipated excellent detector performance, the CEPC can explore beauty and $\textit{τ}$ physics in ways that are superior to or complementary with the Belle II and Large-Hadron-Collider-beauty experiments, potentially enabling the detection of new physics at energy scales of 10 TeV and above. This potential also extends to the observation of yet-to-be-discovered rare and exotic processes, as well as testing fundamental principles such as lepton flavor universality, lepton and baryon number conservation, etc., making the CEPC a vibrant platform for flavor physics research. The $\textit{WW}$ threshold scan, Higgs-factory operation and top-pair productions of the CEPC further enhance its merits in this regard, especially for measuring the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa matrix elements, and Flavor-Changing-Neutral-Current physics of Higgs boson and top quarks. We outline the requirements for detector performance and considerations for future development to achieve the anticipated scientific goals. The role of machine learning for innovative detector design and advanced reconstruction algorithms is also stressed. The CEPC flavor physics program not only develops new capabilities for exploring flavor physics beyond existing projects but also enriches the physics opportunities of this machine. It should be remarked that, given the richness of the CEPC flavor physics, this manuscript is not meant to be a comprehensive survey, but rather an investigation of representative cases. Uncovering the full potential of flavor physics at the CEPC will require further dedicated explorations in the future.

China

Xiaocong Ai

United States

Wolfgang Altmannshofer

Peter Athron

Xiaozhi Bai

Lorenzo Calibbi

Germany

Lu Cao

Yuzhi Che

Chunhui Chen

Ji-Yuan Chen

Long Chen

Mingshui Chen

Shanzhen Chen

Xuan Chen

Shan Cheng

Cheng-Wei Chiang

Switzerland

Andreas Crivellin

Hanhua Cui

France

Olivier Deschamps

Sébastien Descotes-Genon

Xiaokang Du

Shuangshi Fang

Yu Gao

Yuanning Gao

Li-Sheng Geng

Pablo Goldenzweig

Jiayin Gu

Feng-Kun Guo

Yuchen Guo

Zhi-Hui Guo

Tao Han

Hong-Jian He

Jibo He

Miao He

Xiaogang He

Yanping Huang

Gino Isidori

Quan Ji

Jianfeng Jiang

Xu-Hui Jiang

Slovenia

Jernej F. Kamenik

Tsz Hong Kwok

Gang Li

Geng Li

Haibo Li

Haitao Li

Hengne Li

Honglei Li

Liang Li

Lingfeng Li

Qiang Li

Shu Li

Xiaomei Li

Xin-Qiang Li

Yiming Li

Yubo Li

Yuji Li

Zhao Li

Hao Liang

Zhijun Liang

Libo Liao

Zoltan Ligeti

Jia Liu

Jianbei Liu

Tao Liu

Yi Liu

Yong Liu

Zhen Liu

Xinchou Lou

Peng-Cheng Lu

Italy

Alberto Lusiani

Hong-Hao Ma

Kai Ma

Farvah Mahmoudi

Yajun Mao

Yaxian Mao

David Marzocca

Juan-Juan Niu

Soeren Prell

Huirong Qi

Sen Qian

Zhuoni Qian

Qin Qin

Ariel Rock

Jonathan L. Rosner

Manqi Ruan

Dingyu Shao

Chengping Shen

Xiaoyan Shen

Haoyu Shi

United Kingdom

Liaoshan Shi

Zong-Guo Si

Cristian Sierra

Huayang Song

Shufang Su

Wei Su

Zhijia Sun

Michele Tammaro

Dayong Wang

En Wang

Flavor physics at the CEPC: a general perspective * We acknowledge financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (12125507, 12047503, 12035008, 2211530479, 12475094, 12135006, 12075097, 12375086, 2022YFA1601903, 12061141007, 12375091, 12342502, 12235018, 12335003, 12105100, 12475106, 11961141015, 12188102, 12175245, 12205171, 12321005, tsqn202312052, 2024HWYQ-005, 12405121, 12447167, 12061141006, 12405102, 12125503,12305115, 12075213, 12335005, 12235008); the Chinese Academy of Sciences (YSBR-101, XDB34030000); the National Key R&D Program of China (2022YFE0116900, 2023YFA1606703, 2022YFA1601901); the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2023YFA1606300); the Excellent Postdoctoral Program of Jiangsu Province (2023ZB891); the Shenzhen Science and Technology Program (202206193000001, 20220816094256002); the Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of Henan Province (242300421046); the Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation (JQ22002); the Area of Excellence (AoE/P-404/18-3) and the General Research Fund (16304321) (both grants are issued by the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong S.A.R); the MOST National Key R&D Program (2023YFA1606303); the Shanghai Key Laboratory for Particle Physics and Cosmology, Key Laboratory for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology (Ministry of Education), Shanghai Jiao Tong University

General one-loop formulas for loop-induced processes $gg/\gamma \gamma \rightarrow \phi_i\phi_j$ with $\phi_i\phi_j = hh,~hH,~HH$ are presented in this paper. The analytic expressions evaluated in this study are valid for a class of Higgs Extensions of the Standard Model, $\textit{e.g.,}$ Inert Doublet Higgs, Two Higgs Doublet, Zee-Babu, and Triplet Higgs Models$\textit{.}$ Analytic expressions for one-loop form factors are expressesd in terms of the basic scalar one-loop two-, three-, and four-point functions following the output format of the packages $ {\tt LoopTools}$ and $ {\tt Collier}$ . Hence, physical results can be evaluated numerically using one of these packages. The analytic results are tested using several checks such as the ultraviolet finiteness and infrared finiteness of the one-loop amplitudes. Furthermore, the amplitudes obey the ward identity due to massless gauge bosons in the initial states. This identity is also verified numerically. Regarding applications, we present the phenomenological results for the investigated processes in the Zee-Babu model as a typical example. In particular, production cross-sections for the processes $\gamma \gamma\rightarrow hh$ are scanned over the parameter space of the Zee-Babu Model.

Vietnam

Khiem Hong Phan

Dzung Tri Tran

Thanh Huy Nguyen

One-loop analytical expressions for $\textit{gg}$/$\textit{γγ}$ → ϕ$_{i}$ϕ$_{j}$ in Higgs extensions of the standard model and their applications * This research is supported by Vietnam National Foundation for Science and Technology Development (103.01-2023.16). Khiem Hong Phan and Dzung Tri Tran express their gratitude to all the valuable support from Duy Tan University, for the 30th anniversary of establishment (Nov. 11, 1994 - Nov. 11, 2024) towards ''Integral, Sustainable and Stable Development''

The identification of jets originating from quarks and gluons, often referred to as quark/gluon tagging, plays an important role in various analyses performed at the Large Hadron Collider, as Standard Model measurements and searches for new particles decaying to quarks often rely on suppressing a large gluon-induced background. This paper describes the measurement of the efficiencies of quark/gluon taggers developed within the ATLAS Collaboration, using $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV proton–proton collision data with an integrated luminosity of 140 fb $^{-1}$ collected by the ATLAS experiment. Two taggers with high performances in rejecting jets from gluon over jets from quarks are studied: one tagger is based on requirements on the number of inner-detector tracks associated with the jet, and the other combines several jet substructure observables using a boosted decision tree. A method is established to determine the quark/gluon fraction in data, by using quark/gluon-enriched subsamples defined by the jet pseudorapidity. Differences in tagging efficiency between data and simulation are provided for jets with transverse momentum between 500 GeV and 2 TeV and for multiple tagger working points.

G. Aad

B. Abbott

K. Abeling

N.J. Abicht

S.H. Abidi

Morocco

A. Aboulhorma

Israel

H. Abramowicz

H. Abreu

Y. Abulaiti

B.S. Acharya

C. Adam Bourdarios

Poland

L. Adamczyk

S.V. Addepalli

M.J. Addison

J. Adelman

A. Adiguzel

T. Adye

A.A. Affolder

Y. Afik

Spain

M.N. Agaras

J. Agarwala

A. Aggarwal

Romania

C. Agheorghiesei

A. Ahmad

Azerbaijan

F. Ahmadov

Canada

W.S. Ahmed

S. Ahuja

X. Ai

G. Aielli

A. Aikot

M. Ait Tamlihat

B. Aitbenchikh

I. Aizenberg

M. Akbiyik

Sweden

T.P.A. Åkesson

A.V. Akimov

Japan

D. Akiyama

N.N. Akolkar

K. Al Khoury

G.L. Alberghi

J. Albert

P. Albicocco

G.L. Albouy

S. Alderweireldt

M. Aleksa

I.N. Aleksandrov

C. Alexa

Greece

T. Alexopoulos

F. Alfonsi

M. Algren

M. Alhroob

Czechia

B. Ali

H.M.J. Ali

S. Ali

S.W. Alibocus

M. Aliev

G. Alimonti

W. Alkakhi

C. Allaire

B.M.M. Allbrooke

J.F. Allen

Chile

C.A. Allendes Flores

P.P. Allport

A. Aloisio

Argentina

F. Alonso

C. Alpigiani

M. Alvarez Estevez

A. Alvarez Fernandez

M. Alves Cardoso

M.G. Alviggi

M. Aly

Brazil

Y. Amaral Coutinho

Performance and calibration of quark/gluon-jet taggers using 140 fb$^{−1}$ of $\textit{pp}$ collisions at ${{\sqrt{\boldsymbol s}\bf = 13}}$ TeV with the ATLAS detector * We acknowledge the support of ANPCyT, Argentina; YerPhI, Armenia; ARC, Australia; BMWFW and FWF, Austria; ANAS, Azerbaijan; CNPq and FAPESP, Brazil; NSERC, NRC and CFI, Canada; CERN; ANID, Chile; CAS, MOST and NSFC, China; Minciencias, Colombia; MEYS CR, Czech Republic; DNRF and DNSRC, Denmark; IN2P3-CNRS and CEA-DRF/IRFU, France; SRNSFG, Georgia; BMBF, HGF and MPG, Germany; GSRI, Greece; RGC and Hong Kong SAR, China; ISF and Benoziyo Center, Israel; INFN, Italy; MEXT and JSPS, Japan; CNRST, Morocco; NWO, Netherlands; RCN, Norway; MEiN, Poland; FCT, Portugal; MNE/IFA, Romania; MESTD, Serbia; MSSR, Slovakia; ARRS and MIZŠ, Slovenia; DSI/NRF, South Africa; MICINN, Spain; SRC and Wallenberg Foundation, Sweden; SERI, SNSF and Cantons of Bern and Geneva, Switzerland; MOST, Taipei; TENMAK, Türkiye; STFC, United Kingdom; DOE and NSF, United States of America. In addition, individual groups and members have received support from BCKDF, CANARIE, CRC and DRAC, Canada; PRIMUS 21/SCI/017 and UNCE SCI/013, Czech Republic; COST, ERC, ERDF, Horizon 2020, ICSC-Next Generation EU and Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions, European Union; Investissements d'Avenir Labex, Investissements d'Avenir Idex and ANR, France; DFG and AvH Foundation, Germany; Herakleitos, Thales and Aristeia programmes co-financed by EU-ESF and the Greek NSRF, Greece; BSF-NSF and MINERVA, Israel; Norwegian Financial Mechanism 2014-2021, Norway; NCN and NAWA, Poland; La Caixa Banking Foundation, CERCA Programme Generalitat de Catalunya and PROMETEO and GenT Programmes Generalitat Valenciana, Spain; Göran Gustafssons Stiftelse, Sweden; The Royal Society and Leverhulme Trust, United Kingdom.